You are here: Home ‣ Dive Into Python 3 ‣
Difficulty level: ♦♦♦♢♢
❝ My spelling is Wobbly. It’s good spelling but it Wobbles, and the letters get in the wrong places. ❞
— Winnie-the-Pooh
Having grown up the son of a librarian and an English major, I have always been fascinated by languages. Not programming languages. Well yes, programming languages, but also natural languages. Take English. English is a schizophrenic language that borrows words from German, French, Spanish, and Latin (to name a few). Actually, “borrows” is the wrong word; “pillages” is more like it. Or perhaps “assimilates” — like the Borg. Yes, I like that.
We are the Borg. Your linguistic and etymological distinctiveness will be added to our own. Resistance is futile.
In this chapter, you’re going to learn about plural nouns. Also, functions that return other functions, advanced regular expressions, and generators. But first, let’s talk about how to make plural nouns. (If you haven’t read the chapter on regular expressions, now would be a good time. This chapter assumes you understand the basics of regular expressions, and it quickly descends into more advanced uses.)
If you grew up in an English-speaking country or learned English in a formal school setting, you’re probably familiar with the basic rules:
(I know, there are a lot of exceptions. Man becomes men and woman becomes women, but human becomes humans. Mouse becomes mice and louse becomes lice, but house becomes houses. Knife becomes knives and wife becomes wives, but lowlife becomes lowlifes. And don’t even get me started on words that are their own plural, like sheep, deer, and haiku.)
Other languages, of course, are completely different.
Let’s design a Python library that automatically pluralizes English nouns. We’ll start with just these four rules, but keep in mind that you’ll inevitably need to add more.
⁂
So you’re looking at words, which, at least in English, means you’re looking at strings of characters. You have rules that say you need to find different combinations of characters, then do different things to them. This sounds like a job for regular expressions!
import re
def plural(noun):
if re.search('[sxz]$', noun): ①
return re.sub('$', 'es', noun) ②
elif re.search('[^aeioudgkprt]h$', noun):
return re.sub('$', 'es', noun)
elif re.search('[^aeiou]y$', noun):
return re.sub('y$', 'ies', noun)
else:
return noun + 's'[sxz] means “s, or x, or z”, but only one of them. The $ should be familiar; it matches the end of string. Combined, this regular expression tests whether noun ends with s, x, or z.
re.sub() function performs regular expression-based string substitutions.
Let’s look at regular expression substitutions in more detail.
>>> import re
>>> re.search('[abc]', 'Mark') ①
<_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x001C1FA8>
>>> re.sub('[abc]', 'o', 'Mark') ②
'Mork'
>>> re.sub('[abc]', 'o', 'rock') ③
'rook'
>>> re.sub('[abc]', 'o', 'caps') ④
'oops'
Mark contain a, b, or c? Yes, it contains a.
a, b, or c, and replace it with o. Mark becomes Mork.
rock into rook.
caps into oaps, but it doesn’t. re.sub replaces all of the matches, not just the first one. So this regular expression turns caps into oops, because both the c and the a get turned into o.
And now, back to the plural() function…
def plural(noun):
if re.search('[sxz]$', noun):
return re.sub('$', 'es', noun) ①
elif re.search('[^aeioudgkprt]h$', noun): ②
return re.sub('$', 'es', noun)
elif re.search('[^aeiou]y$', noun): ③
return re.sub('y$', 'ies', noun)
else:
return noun + 's'$) with the string es. In other words, adding es to the string. You could accomplish the same thing with string concatenation, for example noun + 'es', but I chose to use regular expressions for each rule, for reasons that will become clear later in the chapter.
^ as the first character inside the square brackets means something special: negation. [^abc] means “any single character except a, b, or c”. So [^aeioudgkprt] means any character except a, e, i, o, u, d, g, k, p, r, or t. Then that character needs to be followed by h, followed by end of string. You’re looking for words that end in H where the H can be heard.
a, e, i, o, or u. You’re looking for words that end in Y that sounds like I.
Let’s look at negation regular expressions in more detail.
>>> import re
>>> re.search('[^aeiou]y$', 'vacancy') ①
<_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x001C1FA8>
>>> re.search('[^aeiou]y$', 'boy') ②
>>>
>>> re.search('[^aeiou]y$', 'day')
>>>
>>> re.search('[^aeiou]y$', 'pita') ③
>>>
vacancy matches this regular expression, because it ends in cy, and c is not a, e, i, o, or u.
boy does not match, because it ends in oy, and you specifically said that the character before the y could not be o. day does not match, because it ends in ay.
pita does not match, because it does not end in y.
>>> re.sub('y$', 'ies', 'vacancy') ①
'vacancies'
>>> re.sub('y$', 'ies', 'agency')
'agencies'
>>> re.sub('([^aeiou])y$', r'\1ies', 'vacancy') ②
'vacancies'
vacancy into vacancies and agency into agencies, which is what you wanted. Note that it would also turn boy into boies, but that will never happen in the function because you did that re.search first to find out whether you should do this re.sub.
y. Then in the substitution string, you use a new syntax, \1, which means “hey, that first group you remembered? put it right here.” In this case, you remember the c before the y; when you do the substitution, you substitute c in place of c, and ies in place of y. (If you have more than one remembered group, you can use \2 and \3 and so on.)
Regular expression substitutions are extremely powerful, and the \1 syntax makes them even more powerful. But combining the entire operation into one regular expression is also much harder to read, and it doesn’t directly map to the way you first described the pluralizing rules. You originally laid out rules like “if the word ends in S, X, or Z, then add ES”. If you look at this function, you have two lines of code that say “if the word ends in S, X, or Z, then add ES”. It doesn’t get much more direct than that.
⁂
Now you’re going to add a level of abstraction. You started by defining a list of rules: if this, do that, otherwise go to the next rule. Let’s temporarily complicate part of the program so you can simplify another part.
import re
def match_sxz(noun):
return re.search('[sxz]$', noun)
def apply_sxz(noun):
return re.sub('$', 'es', noun)
def match_h(noun):
return re.search('[^aeioudgkprt]h$', noun)
def apply_h(noun):
return re.sub('$', 'es', noun)
def match_y(noun): ①
return re.search('[^aeiou]y$', noun)
def apply_y(noun): ②
return re.sub('y$', 'ies', noun)
def match_default(noun):
return True
def apply_default(noun):
return noun + 's'
rules = ((match_sxz, apply_sxz), ③
(match_h, apply_h),
(match_y, apply_y),
(match_default, apply_default)
)
def plural(noun):
for matches_rule, apply_rule in rules: ④
if matches_rule(noun):
return apply_rule(noun)re.search() function.
re.sub() function to apply the appropriate pluralization rule.
plural()) with multiple rules, you have the rules data structure, which is a sequence of pairs of functions.
plural() function can be reduced to a few lines of code. Using a for loop, you can pull out the match and apply rules two at a time (one match, one apply) from the rules structure. On the first iteration of the for loop, matches_rule will get match_sxz, and apply_rule will get apply_sxz. On the second iteration (assuming you get that far), matches_rule will be assigned match_h, and apply_rule will be assigned apply_h. The function is guaranteed to return something eventually, because the final match rule (match_default) simply returns True, meaning the corresponding apply rule (apply_default) will always be applied.
The reason this technique works is that everything in Python is an object, including functions. The rules data structure contains functions — not names of functions, but actual function objects. When they get assigned in the for loop, then matches_rule and apply_rule are actual functions that you can call. On the first iteration of the for loop, this is equivalent to calling matches_sxz(noun), and if it returns a match, calling apply_sxz(noun).
If this additional level of abstraction is confusing, try unrolling the function to see the equivalence. The entire for loop is equivalent to the following:
def plural(noun):
if match_sxz(noun):
return apply_sxz(noun)
if match_h(noun):
return apply_h(noun)
if match_y(noun):
return apply_y(noun)
if match_default(noun):
return apply_default(noun)The benefit here is that the plural() function is now simplified. It takes a sequence of rules, defined elsewhere, and iterates through them in a generic fashion.
The rules could be defined anywhere, in any way. The plural() function doesn’t care.
Now, was adding this level of abstraction worth it? Well, not yet. Let’s consider what it would take to add a new rule to the function. In the first example, it would require adding an if statement to the plural() function. In this second example, it would require adding two functions, match_foo() and apply_foo(), and then updating the rules sequence to specify where in the order the new match and apply functions should be called relative to the other rules.
But this is really just a stepping stone to the next section. Let’s move on…
⁂
Defining separate named functions for each match and apply rule isn’t really necessary. You never call them directly; you add them to the rules sequence and call them through there. Furthermore, each function follows one of two patterns. All the match functions call re.search(), and all the apply functions call re.sub(). Let’s factor out the patterns so that defining new rules can be easier.
import re
def build_match_and_apply_functions(pattern, search, replace):
def matches_rule(word): ①
return re.search(pattern, word)
def apply_rule(word): ②
return re.sub(search, replace, word)
return (matches_rule, apply_rule) ③build_match_and_apply_functions() is a function that builds other functions dynamically. It takes pattern, search and replace, then defines a matches_rule() function which calls re.search() with the pattern that was passed to the build_match_and_apply_functions() function, and the word that was passed to the matches_rule() function you’re building. Whoa.
re.sub() with the search and replace parameters that were passed to the build_match_and_apply_functions() function, and the word that was passed to the apply_rule() function you’re building. This technique of using the values of outside parameters within a dynamic function is called closures. You’re essentially defining constants within the apply function you’re building: it takes one parameter (word), but it then acts on that plus two other values (search and replace) which were set when you defined the apply function.
build_match_and_apply_functions() function returns a tuple of two values: the two functions you just created. The constants you defined within those functions (pattern within the matches_rule() function, and search and replace within the apply_rule() function) stay with those functions, even after you return from build_match_and_apply_functions(). That’s insanely cool.
If this is incredibly confusing (and it should be, this is weird stuff), it may become clearer when you see how to use it.
patterns = \ ①
(
('[sxz]$', '$', 'es'),
('[^aeioudgkprt]h$', '$', 'es'),
('(qu|[^aeiou])y$', 'y$', 'ies'),
('$', '$', 's') ②
)
rules = [build_match_and_apply_functions(pattern, search, replace) ③
for (pattern, search, replace) in patterns]re.search() to see if this rule matches. The second and third strings in each group are the search and replace expressions you would use in re.sub() to actually apply the rule to turn a noun into its plural.
match_default() function simply returned True, meaning that if none of the more specific rules matched, the code would simply add an s to the end of the given word. This example does something functionally equivalent. The final regular expression asks whether the word has an end ($ matches the end of a string). Of course, every string has an end, even an empty string, so this expression always matches. Thus, it serves the same purpose as the match_default() function that always returned True: it ensures that if no more specific rule matches, the code adds an s to the end of the given word.
build_match_and_apply_functions() function. That is, it takes each triplet of strings and calls the build_match_and_apply_functions() function with those three strings as arguments. The build_match_and_apply_functions() function returns a tuple of two functions. This means that rules ends up being functionally equivalent to the previous example: a list of tuples, where each tuple is a pair of functions. The first function is the match function that calls re.search(), and the second function is the apply function that calls re.sub().
Rounding out this version of the script is the main entry point, the plural() function.
def plural(noun):
for matches_rule, apply_rule in rules: ①
if matches_rule(noun):
return apply_rule(noun)plural() function hasn’t changed at all. It’s completely generic; it takes a list of rule functions and calls them in order. It doesn’t care how the rules are defined. In the previous example, they were defined as separate named functions. Now they are built dynamically by mapping the output of the build_match_and_apply_functions() function onto a list of raw strings. It doesn’t matter; the plural() function still works the same way.
⁂
You’ve factored out all the duplicate code and added enough abstractions so that the pluralization rules are defined in a list of strings. The next logical step is to take these strings and put them in a separate file, where they can be maintained separately from the code that uses them.
First, let’s create a text file that contains the rules you want. No fancy data structures, just whitespace-delimited strings in three columns. Let’s call it plural4-rules.txt.
[sxz]$ $ es
[^aeioudgkprt]h$ $ es
[^aeiou]y$ y$ ies
$ $ sNow let’s see how you can use this rules file.
import re
def build_match_and_apply_functions(pattern, search, replace): ①
def matches_rule(word):
return re.search(pattern, word)
def apply_rule(word):
return re.sub(search, replace, word)
return (matches_rule, apply_rule)
rules = []
with open('plural4-rules.txt', encoding='utf-8') as pattern_file: ②
for line in pattern_file: ③
pattern, search, replace = line.split(None, 3) ④
rules.append(build_match_and_apply_functions( ⑤
pattern, search, replace))build_match_and_apply_functions() function has not changed. You’re still using closures to build two functions dynamically that use variables defined in the outer function.
open() function opens a file and returns a file object. In this case, the file we’re opening contains the pattern strings for pluralizing nouns. The with statement creates what’s called a context: when the with block ends, Python will automatically close the file, even if an exception is raised inside the with block. You’ll learn more about with blocks and file objects in the Files chapter.
for line in <fileobject> idiom reads data from the open file, one line at a time, and assigns the text to the line variable. You’ll learn more about reading from files in the Files chapter.
split() string method. The first argument to the split() method is None, which means “split on any whitespace (tabs or spaces, it makes no difference).” The second argument is 3, which means “split on whitespace 3 times, then leave the rest of the line alone.” A line like [sxz]$ $ es will be broken up into the list ['[sxz]$', '$', 'es'], which means that pattern will get '[sxz]$', search will get '$', and replace will get 'es'. That’s a lot of power in one little line of code.
pattern, search, and replace to the build_match_and_apply_functions() function, which returns a tuple of functions. You append this tuple to the rules list, and rules ends up storing the list of match and apply functions that the plural() function expects.
The improvement here is that you’ve completely separated the pluralization rules into an external file, so it can be maintained separately from the code that uses it. Code is code, data is data, and life is good.
⁂
Wouldn’t it be grand to have a generic plural() function that parses the rules file? Get rules, check for a match, apply appropriate transformation, go to next rule. That’s all the plural() function has to do, and that’s all the plural() function should do.
def rules(rules_filename):
with open(rules_filename, encoding='utf-8') as pattern_file:
for line in pattern_file:
pattern, search, replace = line.split(None, 3)
yield build_match_and_apply_functions(pattern, search, replace)
def plural(noun, rules_filename='plural5-rules.txt'):
for matches_rule, apply_rule in rules(rules_filename):
if matches_rule(noun):
return apply_rule(noun)
raise ValueError('no matching rule for {0}'.format(noun))How the heck does that work? Let’s look at an interactive example first.
>>> def make_counter(x):
... print('entering make_counter')
... while True:
... yield x ①
... print('incrementing x')
... x = x + 1
...
>>> counter = make_counter(2) ②
>>> counter ③
<generator object at 0x001C9C10>
>>> next(counter) ④
entering make_counter
2
>>> next(counter) ⑤
incrementing x
3
>>> next(counter) ⑥
incrementing x
4
yield keyword in make_counter means that this is not a normal function. It is a special kind of function which generates values one at a time. You can think of it as a resumable function. Calling it will return a generator that can be used to generate successive values of x.
make_counter generator, just call it like any other function. Note that this does not actually execute the function code. You can tell this because the first line of the make_counter() function calls print(), but nothing has been printed yet.
make_counter() function returns a generator object.
next() function takes a generator object and returns its next value. The first time you call next() with the counter generator, it executes the code in make_counter() up to the first yield statement, then returns the value that was yielded. In this case, that will be 2, because you originally created the generator by calling make_counter(2).
next() with the same generator object resumes exactly where it left off and continues until it hits the next yield statement. All variables, local state, &c. are saved on yield and restored on next(). The next line of code waiting to be executed calls print(), which prints incrementing x. After that, the statement x = x + 1. Then it loops through the while loop again, and the first thing it hits is the statement yield x, which saves the state of everything and returns the current value of x (now 3).
next(counter), you do all the same things again, but this time x is now 4.
Since make_counter sets up an infinite loop, you could theoretically do this forever, and it would just keep incrementing x and spitting out values. But let’s look at more productive uses of generators instead.
def fib(max):
a, b = 0, 1 ①
while a < max:
yield a ②
a, b = b, a + b ③1, goes up slowly at first, then more and more rapidly. To start the sequence, you need two variables: a starts at 0, and b starts at 1.
a + b) and assign that to b for later use. Note that this happens in parallel; if a is 3 and b is 5, then a, b = b, a + b will set a to 5 (the previous value of b) and b to 8 (the sum of the previous values of a and b).
So you have a function that spits out successive Fibonacci numbers. Sure, you could do that with recursion, but this way is easier to read. Also, it works well with for loops.
>>> from fibonacci import fib >>> for n in fib(1000): ① ... print(n, end=' ') ② 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 >>> list(fib(1000)) ③ [0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987]
fib() in a for loop directly. The for loop will automatically call the next() function to get values from the fib() generator and assign them to the for loop index variable (n).
for loop, n gets a new value from the yield statement in fib(), and all you have to do is print it out. Once fib() runs out of numbers (a becomes bigger than max, which in this case is 1000), then the for loop exits gracefully.
list() function, and it will iterate through the entire generator (just like the for loop in the previous example) and return a list of all the values.
Let’s go back to plural5.py and see how this version of the plural() function works.
def rules(rules_filename):
with open(rules_filename, encoding='utf-8') as pattern_file:
for line in pattern_file:
pattern, search, replace = line.split(None, 3) ①
yield build_match_and_apply_functions(pattern, search, replace) ②
def plural(noun, rules_filename='plural5-rules.txt'):
for matches_rule, apply_rule in rules(rules_filename): ③
if matches_rule(noun):
return apply_rule(noun)
raise ValueError('no matching rule for {0}'.format(noun))line.split(None, 3) to get the three “columns” and assign them to three local variables.
build_match_and_apply_functions(), which is identical to the previous examples. In other words, rules() is a generator that spits out match and apply functions on demand.
rules() is a generator, you can use it directly in a for loop. The first time through the for loop, you will call the rules() function, which will open the pattern file, read the first line, dynamically build a match function and an apply function from the patterns on that line, and yield the dynamically built functions. The second time through the for loop, you will pick up exactly where you left off in rules() (which was in the middle of the for line in pattern_file loop). The first thing it will do is read the next line of the file (which is still open), dynamically build another match and apply function based on the patterns on that line in the file, and yield the two functions.
What have you gained over stage 4? Startup time. In stage 4, when you imported the plural4 module, it read the entire patterns file and built a list of all the possible rules, before you could even think about calling the plural() function. With generators, you can do everything lazily: you read the first rule and create functions and try them, and if that works you don’t ever read the rest of the file or create any other functions.
What have you lost? Performance! Every time you call the plural() function, the rules() generator starts over from the beginning — which means re-opening the patterns file and reading from the beginning, one line at a time.
What if you could have the best of both worlds: minimal startup cost (don’t execute any code on import), and maximum performance (don’t build the same functions over and over again). Oh, and you still want to keep the rules in a separate file (because code is code and data is data), just as long as you never have to read the same line twice.
To do that, you’ll need to build your own iterator. But before you do that, you need to learn about Python classes.
⁂
© 2001–11 Mark Pilgrim